Via James Nicoll: Teddybabes, meet Teddy babes. (If the main page for the latter doesn’t make you want to disown your species, the FAQ will probably do the trick.)
Suggestions for appropriate tags for this post would be welcomed.
Via James Nicoll: Teddybabes, meet Teddy babes. (If the main page for the latter doesn’t make you want to disown your species, the FAQ will probably do the trick.)
Suggestions for appropriate tags for this post would be welcomed.
October 23, 2006 at 0:07
I’ve made a “creepy plush things” tag – problem solved!
October 23, 2006 at 8:16
Somehow that just doesn’t seem to go far enough.
October 23, 2006 at 13:49
How about “things too perverted for the town pervert” or “yet another reason women plan to become a separate species as soon as possible”
October 24, 2006 at 0:35
This is completely unbelievable.
I mean, seven hundred dollars? That’s absurd.
Tag suggestion: “fuck-muppets”.
– tom
October 24, 2006 at 0:36
Also, when women become a separate species, will you take the greetings cards with babies on them with you? They freak me out.
– tom
October 24, 2006 at 8:12
Tag suggestion: “fuck-muppets”
Seedy and descriptive. That’s what we like about you, Tom.
October 25, 2006 at 1:21
What? It’s what they are. The term combines precision and economy. Just add the damn tag.
– tom
October 26, 2006 at 0:36
Also, whilst looking for evidence of prior use of the term, i came across the delightful word ‘cuntsock’. I suggest that this be used to refer to the, er, ultra-silky plush insert.
– tom
October 26, 2006 at 1:09
Tag added.